- overcome race & class divisions
- issue: historical inequalities, longstanding cultural stereotypes
- fight for 1. education, 2. economic opportunity, 3. democratic progress
- where can you build relationships across racial lines for common action?
- our social life is segregated
- political groups, organized along racial lines
- coalitions back candidates that help elect blacks and others to office
- anti-racist laws have been passed, government programs for social provision have been passed
- need roots in communities
- interest based coalitions: not effective, narrow interpretation of self/group interests doesn't uplift oppressed groups
- electoral coalitions help multiracial cooperation
- to forge alliances: 1. leadership, 2. relationship building, 3. ideology
- get past 1. mistrust, 2. racism, 3. ignorance
- cooperative action > greater trust, relationships, mutual understanding
- need to lead to cooperative action
- IAF: innovative model of multiracial cooperation
- William Julius Wilson has argued that the current period offers an important opening for the creation of a "bridge over the racial divide. " Rising economic inequality in the midst of an economic boom provides working and middle-class Americans of all races with a common interest in a set of government programs that can improve their lot vis-a-vis the wealthy."
- broad based organization with blacks, Anglos, Mexican Americans (Fort Worth)
- 1. races, 2. classes, 3. religion denominations CAN work together
- Fort Worth had 1/3 of Tarrant Country's population
- most of its growth occurred in the suburbs
- 1990: grown from 385k to 448k, 28th largest American city
- blacks 22.8%, Hispanics 13% > blacks 22%, Hispanics 19.5%
- segregated city: blacks in east side and central city
- there was a middle class exodus from black poor neighborhoods
- Fort Worth: center for the oil industry
- affluent lived outside of city limits
- 1990: 28% of blacks in poverty, 23% of Hispanic families in poverty
- had been controlled by the "Seventh Street Gang" created by Amon Carter
- the "Gang" wasn't as unified as the good government league
- thankfully in the 1960s, study committees and neighborhood conferences
- 1978: 2 blacks, 1 Hispanic won election
- black electoral politics, organized around specifically families
- Zapata won a position on the north side
- Texas Democrats, strong support in Fort Worth
- industrial unions anchored the Fort Worth Democratic party
- patronage-style local politics: black ministers would support white politicians to get benefits for their communities
- integration came peacefully to FW without violence/strong civil rights movement
- legal segregation ended in 1967 but de facto segregation continued
- neighborhood segregation continued
- Fort Worth ministers heard about COPS success in San Antonio, wanted an IAF in their city
- racially based politics-ineffective @ dealing with the quality of life in poor black communities
- ministers looked for allies with a shared religious outlook & wanted it to lead to social/political action
- 1. relationship building, 2. sponsoring stage > common ground
- "get it all out-don't submerge it."
- General Dynamics fought IAF involvement
- affluent white church members fought IAF
- St. Matthew's Lutheran: lower middle & professional classes: teachers, nurses, insurance people, engineers, few wealthy/few blue collar. felt their quality of life threatened by cutbacks @ General Dynamics
- need to address common needs & feel like you have a sense of power
- property values were too low for people to move
- Rev. Boggs: recognized people were insecure about their financial position and wanted change, have to help middle class see common ground with lower middle class
- Rodriguez, social services leader, helped on grape boycott in the 60s
- low tension between Hispanics and blacks in Fort Worth
- Rodriguez wanted to generate power for a community-wide base
- ACT won 7/8 changes in utilities legislation
Community Initiatives and Mutual Support, p. 106
- broad based organizations, allow communities to assert own needs and take initiative
- congregations are encouraged to develop their own initiatives
- needs of blacks don't have to be overlooked in multiracial organizations
- Rev. Davis wanted to combat educational decline among black youth
- 85% of students got reduced cost lunches, 51%+ came from single person families
- the school was firebombed in 1985
- goal: get parents involved in the educations of their children
- problem: parents felt isolated from one another
- created after school program with sports, arts, and academic tutoring
- gave awards to parents who read to their children
- created a summer reading program and recognized people
- address neighborhood issues that effect the school
- 1988, Perkins, new organizer for IAF
- problem: blacks and Hispanics in competition for scarce resources
Bond Elections, p.111
- raise $ for improvements to city's infrastructure by submitting bond packages for an electorate
- inner city leaders needed funding for specific projects
- Morningside School campaign built trust
- church leaders-researched community needs
- got $ for streets and drainage projects
- white middle class and working class voters thought the development of a cultural district would benefit only the wealthy
- 21/30 precincts approved the plan, redevelopment project defeat
Synergy, p. 113
- congregations had demands, part of bond package
- 1990s: workers hurt by downsizing of local defense industries
- 1993, multiracial group created a plan for long-term job-training
- white, black, Hispanic ACT leaders
- Reverand Boggs, key leader
- jobs, organizing issue
Building Understanding and Trust
- church committees > campaigns
- develop relationships and trust & begin to depend on each other
- everything changes because of relationships built in ACT
Religious Values as a Broadly Unifying Force
- society is fractured along racial lines
- common beliefs/shared identity as people of God> help people to see themselves within the same community
- meetings start with prayer
- prayer serves a unifying function
- prayers should call people to social action/refer to the building of community
The Limits of Multiracial Unity in Act
- 1991, skinhead shot a black man, wasn't given a prison term. 10,000 marched in protest in downtown Fort Worth
- ACT didn't join the march
- 1. ACT can't respond quickly to new issues
- 2. ACT doesn't see itself as a protest organization
- 3. blacks did not demand ACT take part in the protest
- successes: Morningside school, common ground in bond-elections and job-training
- ACT does not discuss issues of race/racism directly
- strong leaders: Rev. Davis, Rev. Boggs, Raymond Rodriguez
- Davis believed IAF tried to expand its number of affiliates too quickly
- ACT, diversity of leadership made relationship building more difficult than the more homogenous Hispanic dominated COPS
Conclusion
- 1. common beliefs and shared identity can bring diverse communities together, use commonality of religion
- 2. importance of institutional organizing
- need to respect the integrity of community traditions/institutions
- letting communities develop initiatives gives them autonomy
- however, avoiding the discussion of racism internally/externally makes relationship building superficial
- Byrd, IAF, black-organizer, worked with drug users/prostitutes in Port Arthur, TX
- black organizers got hired